A bitter High Court dispute has broken out between prospective neighbours in excess of the development of the wall at a coastal site in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance which has attracted countrywide consideration next an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed relatives property at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of arranging breaches, environmental concerns, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Instances short article about René Collier as well as the Irish Periods article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has evolved into a hugely publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design will work at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and an organization director respectively, look for to construct their family members dwelling. The situation happens to be emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, the place advancement pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of recognized people. In accordance with the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting created by their potential neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted less than organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two people of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their setting up authorization by building a wall further than the boundaries in their site, resulting in an encroachment on the Special Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, as such spots are issue to rigorous controls underneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Inside their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments could have Long lasting ecological implications, significantly in a delicate coastal environment such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach in their planning authorization, and say the wall, which can be partly created, is in the correct position. Their lawful group has characterised the motion being an try and delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding in order to preserve their see, an allegation that has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of many coastal setting up disputes, the place views of the sea are equally very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic endeavours from the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the website, according to sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded by means of waistline-high drinking water through a storm to photograph the website Irish Occasions, an image which includes since become emblematic of your intensity from the dispute. These actions weren't merely symbolic; they had been intended to Assemble Visible evidence in the wall’s position relative to tidal strains and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site with the sea Irish Situations claimed, describing how The 2 Guys entered the drinking water throughout significant weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm water to photograph the positioning became one of the most placing descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely famous that these types of actions had been cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into a place afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being coated in detail because of the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 became commonly searched phrases as readers sought to know the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to more submissions on whether interim orders should be granted to halt building pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential minute during the authorized timeline.
Within the Main in the dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep the wall, as made, goes outside of what was permitted and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has become described as meticulous in his assessment of scheduling documents, maps, and disorders hooked up to your authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally pressured that their action is inspired by concern for environmental security and adherence to scheduling legislation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal look at, insisting as an alternative that it is about guaranteeing that development at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've got described their lengthy-standing connection to the area as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a few merely wanting to produce a spouse and children home in accordance Together with the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches with a Specific Region of Conservation and say that each one functions happen to be performed determined by Experienced assistance and accredited designs. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, like moving into The ocean all through a storm, usually do not alter the underlying info.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how organizing disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute in excess of design of wall at coastal website is becoming a shorthand description for the situation a large number of observers see as increasingly typical. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation concerning private land, public foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming more contentious.
The Irish Periods report about René Collier mentioned that the businessman had Earlier been linked to regional advocacy on scheduling and environmental problems, though not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Times write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from pretty Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 unique professional backgrounds can find on their own aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, became synonymous Using the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website through the sea Irish Situations coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of waistline-high h2o during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Times and René Collier waded by means of waist-high water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared repeatedly in protection, reflecting equally the Bodily actuality of the coastline plus the symbolic nature of your act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an too much technique.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue on, the result continues to be uncertain. The court docket have to figure out whether or not the wall as constructed complies with preparing authorization and no matter whether any encroachment into a Particular Place of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and scheduling ailments. Nevertheless the human component continues to be central: neighbours who need to live alongside one another very long after the legal prices are paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about construction performs at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, but the implications of the case lengthen outside of that handle. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the importance of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition it underscores how speedily a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential issues like environmental defense and home rights are perceived being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand stays a spot of organic magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre from the dispute stands partially constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful inquiries. No matter whether it can in the end be altered, eradicated, or done as prepared will rely on the court docket’s findings. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will probably continue to appear in headlines, joined indelibly to Just about the most closely viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin in recent years.