A bitter High Court dispute has broken out amongst potential neighbours more than the construction of the wall at a coastal web page within a north Dublin suburb, a case which has attracted nationwide focus next an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of organizing breaches, environmental problems, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Moments report about René Collier and the Irish Times article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a local disagreement has evolved into a really publicised lawful fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over development will work at the location on Dublin Highway, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a business director respectively, search for to develop their family residence. The situation happens to be emblematic of broader disputes together Eire’s coastline, where enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of established citizens. Based on the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being constructed by their possible neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted underneath planning permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Street, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their preparing authorization by creating a wall further than the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment over a Exclusive Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result parts are subject to rigorous controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments might have Long lasting ecological implications, particularly in a sensitive coastal surroundings for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach in their scheduling permission, and say the wall, that is partially designed, is in the correct place. Their authorized workforce has characterised the action as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The couple accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding in an effort to preserve their see, an allegation which has been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, where by sights of the sea are both equally highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described spectacular attempts because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the website, In keeping with sworn proof referenced within the Irish Situations. In a single account, Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-substantial h2o all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods, an image which includes considering that come to be emblematic of your depth with the dispute. These actions were not basically symbolic; they ended up intended to Assemble visual proof on the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site with the sea Irish Periods reported, describing how the two Guys entered the h2o throughout intense climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the location grew to become One of the more putting descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this sort of actions were being cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall extended into a place affected by tidal motion, strengthening their argument the SAC was becoming encroached upon.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up coated intimately through the countrywide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 turned extensively searched phrases as audience sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard more submissions on no matter whether interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute while in the authorized timeline.
With the core from the dispute is really a disagreement more than boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve which the wall, as Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 manufactured, goes outside of what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and situations hooked up to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their motion is determined by concern for environmental defense and adherence to organizing regulation. They reject promises that the situation is about preserving A non-public perspective, insisting in its place that it is about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their very long-standing connection to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a few basically trying to develop a relatives dwelling in accordance with the law. They deny that the wall encroaches with a Distinctive Spot of Conservation and say that each one operates are performed based on Skilled guidance and accepted strategies. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, including getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, do not alter the fundamental information.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how organizing disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute in excess of construction of wall at coastal web-site has become a shorthand description for the condition that lots of observers see as progressively typical. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation amongst personal land, public foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming more contentious.
The Irish Situations post about René Collier mentioned which the businessman experienced previously been linked to area advocacy on planning and environmental problems, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Times article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from incredibly diverse Skilled backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, are becoming synonymous With all the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from your sea Irish Situations protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-superior h2o during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Moments and René Collier waded via waist-superior water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting both of those the Actual physical reality on the coastline and the symbolic nature of the act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive approach.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the result continues to be uncertain. The courtroom must determine if the wall as constructed complies with arranging permission and no matter if any encroachment right into a Particular Area of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and setting up circumstances. Still the human aspect stays central: neighbours who ought to Are living together with one another very long following the authorized expenditures are already paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design operates at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, however the implications of the case increase further than that tackle. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the necessity of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. Furthermore, it underscores how swiftly a local disagreement can escalate when elementary concerns like environmental security and assets legal rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains a place of natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre from the dispute stands partly designed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful queries. Regardless of whether it is going to ultimately be altered, taken out, or done as prepared will depend on the court’s findings. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will possible carry on to seem in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most carefully watched organizing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.